If you were not limited by the demands of the national/regional curriculum, what would you say is the most important thing you would teach your students about your subject (in a CLIL context)? How would you assess their learning?
In
my opinion, the most important thing is to communicate the students
the real utility of the subject I teach —technical
training course in forestry and nature conservation—
for their effective incorporation into the labour market and,
eventually, for life.
The
aim is not easy: we must take account of the fact which the reality
of work is; transmit to a very demanding —and
more insightful than it might seem at first sight—
collective (pupils) the right skills for effective job performance,
putting superfluous contents aside and emphasizing, however, on those
skills that are really useful; instill the benefits of teamwork,
basic in any workplace; explain the importance of adaptability to
different circumstances and contingencies that arise in any work
environment; and get them become autonomous to face up to
difficulties of any kind existing in the future.
Not
only that: the extraordinary importance attached to the rules of
prevention of occupational risks, resulting in worker safety and that
of others, has to be transmitted; as well as other factors, such as
the need to maintain in good condition the material the secondary
school provides for learning. In any case, there is one which is
specially relevant: the value of effort, both to pass the course and
working life, in which nobody will give them anything at all.
And
all that taking into account the specificities of the subject I
teach; for that reason, respect for the environment must be present
at all times.
Learning
assessment would take place through teaching practices (mountain
outings, company visits, etc) that predominate over theory. Also, I
would enhance the audiovisual media (DVD, videos, reports ...) on the
textbook. The language used should be simple, objective and direct,
to the point, trying to avoid dense or twisted explanations, and
dropping from time to time (why not?) a touch of humour. It would
also be very helpful to use references that students feel as their
own, as they would be extremely useful for transmitting knowledge.
The
specific evaluation would be continuous: in this way, progression of
each student and effort they have made throughout the course,
according to their capabilities, would be observed. The predominance
of practical content, as well as aptitude, on the purely theoretical
would be also reflected when assigning marks.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario